ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2026
Percutaneous Repair in Patients Aged 50 Years and Older Is Associated With Good Outcomes in Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of Achilles tendon ruptures in patients aged ≥50 years is increasing worldwide with an aging population that is increasingly physically active and taking up recreational activities, such as pickleball and paddleball. The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes in patients aged ≥50 years with a complete Achilles tendon rupture comparing percutaneous repair to non-operative management over 12 months. Methods: This is a single-centre prospective cohort study with patients recruited over a 10-year period. Patients filled an Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) at 3-month, 6-month and 12-month intervals. Results: 173 patients were included; 70 patients were managed operatively and 103 patients were managed non-operatively. At 12 months, 50 patients (71.4%) in the operative group and 57 patients (55.3%) in the non-operative group completed the ATRS score. At 3-month and 6-month intervals, there was no statistically significant difference in average ATRS scores ( Conclusion: Patients aged ≥50 years who undergo percutaneous repair had higher ATRS scores at 12 months compared with non-operative care. Percutaneous repair appears to be a valid option for management of these injuries in an increasingly active population aged ≥50 years. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.