ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Indigenous Management Practices to Reduce Pests and Pathogens of Cash Crops in Agroforestry Systems.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Indigenous Management Practices to Reduce Pests and Pathogens of Cash Crops in Agroforestry Systems.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indigenous farming practices (e.g., traditional agroforestry) can sustain high levels of biodiversity and ecosystem services (e.g., natural pest and pathogen control) and can be sustainable in the long term, especially if integrated with innovation and technology. We investigate the factors influencing pests and pathogen impact on agroforestry practices in Indigenous communities in Bali, Indonesia. We collected data via 100 plots with different compositions of crops in both community forests (where the use of agrochemicals is precluded by social rules) and polyculture (with no limitation on the use of agrochemicals). For each plot, we obtained a score of infestation for four cash crops (banana, coffee, cacao, and vanilla) by calculating the proportion of plants affected and giving a percentage score of infestation. Analysis was performed via generalised additive models with crop richness, canopy cover, and agroforestry type as factors. The crop with highest damage was cocoa (63.9% plants affected by black pod disease) and we also recorded a widespread incidence of the vascular streak dieback (19.4% plants affected). Fusarium stem rot was the second highest damage in crops, with 30.0% of vanilla plants infected. Fusarium wilt affected 10.2% of banana plants and the coffee berry borer affected 9.7% of coffee plants. There were no differences in pest and pathogen incidence between community forest and polyculture, thus insecticides and fungicides had little to no impact on crop infestations. An increased crop richness favoured a reduction in some insect pests, suggesting a potential increase in natural pest control. Since insecticides and fungicides do not seem to have a significant impact in reducing pest and pathogen infestation (probably due to genetic variability and resistance of pests and pathogens), the most effective Indigenous practice is to diversify profits from different crops, thus buffering the negative effects of market fluctuations and yield loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.