ArticleDigital health
Machine learning for the early prediction of sepsis patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) based on clinical data.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to predict 28-day mortality in sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: Initial clinical data from sepsis patients at the time of hospital admission including demographic characteristics, biochemical markers, infection sites, common comorbidities, and scoring systems were used to predict 28-day mortality of sepsis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied to identify the most relevant predictive variables. After comparing seven algorithms-adaptive boosting, logistic regression, random forest (RF), Results: Seven critical features were screened including platelet distribution width to count ratio, mean platelet volume, serum creatinine, lactate, D-dimer, APACHE II score, and respiratory system infection. Among the seven algorithms, RF outperformed the others significantly. After training with the best-performing algorithm, the AUCs of the model in the training and validation sets were 1.0 and 0.933, respectively, and the model also performed well in the test set (AUC = 0.900, sensitivity = 0.742, specificity = 0.902, accuracy = 0.841, F1 score = 0.780). Conclusions: A 28-day mortality in sepsis patients can be accurately predicted at an early stage using a machine learning model based on routinely collected clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.