Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696076›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Using the internet privately for health purposes in the post-pandemic era: Frequency and associated factors. Findings based on a large sample of the German general adult population.

André Hajek, Ariana Neumann, Supa Pengpid, Karl Peltzer, Hans-Helmut König

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

André HajekDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-2745
Ariana NeumannDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany.
Supa PengpidDepartment of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Karl PeltzerDepartment of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to describe and investigate the factors associated with private internet use for health purposes in the post-pandemic era. Methods: Data were taken from a quota-based online sample ( Results: In total, 60.7% of the participants researched health issues, 20.7% of the participants exchanged views or discussed health issues, and 12.0% of the participants used telemedicine services (e.g. online consultations). Among such individuals privately using the internet for health purposes, the average hours per week for such activities were 1.4 h (SD: 2.0; health issues), 1.9 h (SD: 3.0; exchange views), and 1.8 h (SD: 2.7; telemedicine services). Regressions showed that higher odds of using the internet privately for Conclusion: Our present study extends our current understanding of using the internet privately for health purposes in Germany. Future longitudinal and cross-country studies are recommended.

Indexed as

chronic conditionsdietdigital healthlonelinessmarital statusonline consultationphysical activitysocial isolationtelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41696076
PMCPMC12901915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.