Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696075›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Digital pathology: Barriers to transitioning to the digital age.

Neil Biswas, Holly Berg, Sanjay K Shukla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neil BiswasDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1646-2434
Holly BergDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA.
Sanjay K ShuklaCenter for Precision Medicine Research, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7267-8572

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital pathology (DP) entails converting physical histologic data into a digital format, ultimately enhancing data transmission, archival, and retrieval. Moreover, digitization serves as an essential prerequisite for utilizing artificial intelligence programs in histologic image analysis. Clinical use of DP has had limited uptake despite its transformative potential and numerous proposed benefits. This paper explores the commonly cited workflow, regulatory, and financial barriers currently hindering DP implementation based on the published experiences of early adopters. It provides an overview of topics including relevant regulatory bodies and guidelines, cost-to-benefit analysis, data management, and the role of artificial intelligence within DP.

Indexed as

adoptionartificial intelligencebarriersDigital pathologydigitizationregulationreturn on investment

Identifiers

PMID41696075
PMCPMC12901937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.