ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Robust prostate cancer risk stratification from unregistered mpMRI via learned cross-modal correspondence.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Accurate prostate cancer risk stratification benefits from the fusion of T2-weighted (T2WI) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) MRI. However, patient motion and imaging distortions frequently cause spatial misalignments between these sequences. While radiologists compensate for this via subjective cognitive fusion, the process introduces inter-reader variability and can be particularly challenging in equivocal cases. Conventional fusion models are even more vulnerable, as they require perfect image registration, making them brittle in real-world clinical scenarios. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning framework that overcomes these limitations by robustly fusing unregistered mpMRI data. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 300 consecutive men (mean age, 71.5 ± 7.6 years) who underwent pre-biopsy prostate mpMRI at our institution between January 2021 and May 2023. All included patients had pathologically confirmed prostate cancer, with high-risk prostate cancer, as defined by NCCN guidelines, present in 184 of 300 cases (61.3%). The dataset was partitioned chronologically into a development cohort (n=250) for 5-fold cross-validation and a temporal test cohort (n=50) for independent evaluation. We developed Cross-Modal Optimal Transport Fusion (CMOT-Fusion), a deep learning framework that learns to identify and match diagnostically relevant regions between misaligned T2WI and ADC images. This approach enables robust multimodal fusion without requiring an explicit image registration step. Results: For discriminating NCCN high-risk versus low/intermediate-risk disease among pathologically confirmed prostate cancer cases, CMOT-Fusion achieved a mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.849 ± 0.034 in 5-fold cross-validation, outperforming single-modality baselines and conventional fusion methods. On an independent test set, the model's performance remained robust, with an ensemble AUC of 0.824 (95% CI: 0.694-0.930; ensemble probability computed as the mean of the five fold-specific model probabilities per patient). As a cohort-specific clinical reference based on routine radiology suspicion scoring, PI-RADS v2.1 achieved an AUC of 0.839 (95% CI: 0.726-0.930) on the same test cohort. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that learning a direct correspondence between unregistered mpMRI sequences significantly improves prostate cancer risk stratification. The proposed CMOT-Fusion framework offers a robust solution to the common clinical problem of inter-sequence misalignment, potentially enhancing diagnostic reliability and streamlining clinical workflows by removing the need for a separate image registration step. Given the single-center retrospective design and the small independent test cohort, these findings should be considered exploratory and warrant multi-center prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.