ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Large language model-driven time-series forecasting of financial network indicators.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable artificial intelligence for postoperative analgesia risk stratification and clinical decision support in abdominal surgery.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Financial markets operate as dynamic networks in which institutional cross-holdings shape the diffusion of information and the propagation of risk. Forecasting the evolution of stock information networks is critical for anticipating herding behavior and safeguarding systemic stability, yet remains challenging due to high-dimensional heterogeneity, structural non-stationarity, and the need for economically interpretable predictions. Methods: Using a quarterly fund-stock holding panel from 2016 to 2024, we construct time-indexed bipartite fund-stock graphs and project them onto the stock layer. From these graphs, we compute two key network indicators: degree centralization (cen_d), capturing market-wide concentration, and residual density (den), reflecting firm-level anomalies. We then develop a large language model (LLM)-enhanced forecasting framework that transforms numeric time series and textual fund disclosures into promptable sequences, incorporates retrieval-augmented historical context, and performs multi-step forecasting of both cen_d and abnormal den spikes. Results: Extensive experiments show that the proposed LLM-based framework significantly reduces mean absolute error and root mean square error, and improves directional accuracy, compared with ARIMA, Prophet, and Temporal Fusion Transformer benchmarks. Attention-weight analysis further indicates that the model assigns higher importance to historical quarters characterized by sharp fund co-movement or policy shocks. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that LLM-driven time-series forecasting can provide early warnings of systemic risk and generate economically interpretable insights for investors and regulators. The results highlight the broader potential of language-informed graph forecasting as a new paradigm for financial market surveillance and policy design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.