Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696042›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Traditional machine learning in biomedical image analysis: before you go too deep.

Elizaveta Chechekhina, Nikita Voloshin, Maksim Solopov, Pyotr Tyurin-Kuzmin, Konstantin Kulebyakin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Machine Learning in Nonhuman Primate Models of Infectious Diseases: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizaveta ChechekhinaMedical Research and Educational Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Nikita VoloshinMedical Research and Educational Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Maksim SolopovV.K. Gusak Institute of Emergency and Reconstructive Surgery, Donetsk, Russia.
Pyotr Tyurin-KuzminMedical Research and Educational Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Konstantin KulebyakinMedical Research and Educational Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional machine learning (TML) algorithms remain indispensable tools for the analysis of biomedical images, offering significant advantages in multimodal data integration, interpretability, computational efficiency, and robustness on smaller datasets. This review provides a comprehensive examination of TML applications across a broad spectrum of biomedical imaging modalities, highlighting its core principles, practical implementation, and unique benefits in the era of deep learning (DL). We outline the fundamental concepts of machine learning and describe key biomedical imaging tasks successfully addressed by TML. We also highlight the most popular platforms, which empower clinicians and researchers to utilize TML. DL now dominates many areas of medical image analysis due to superior performance and end-to-end feature learning. Using the most prominent examples, we analyze how TML retains unique value for applications with multimodal data processing, limited data, interpretability requirements, or rapid prototyping needs. Supported by increasingly democratized tools and validated by robust clinical studies, TML remains a vital methodology for extracting quantitative and qualitative insights from biomedical image data, ensuring its continued relevance in both research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

biomedical image analysisobject classificationradiomicssemantic segmentationtraditional machine learning

Identifiers

PMID41696042
PMCPMC12894268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.