ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Electrophysiological evaluation of incidental superior vena cava isolation following pulsed field ablation: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is increasingly adopted for atrial fibrillation (AF) due to its efficacy and lower risk of complications. However, uniform transmural energy delivery may induce excessive tissue modification and unintended effects on adjacent structures. Pulsed field ablation of the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) can result in conduction delay within the superior vena cava (SVC), but its electrophysiological properties remain poorly characterized. Case summary: An 81-year-old man with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, chronic heart failure, and paroxysmal AF underwent PFA for pulmonary vein isolation and posterior wall isolation. Pre-ablation mapping revealed myocardial sleeves within the SVC. Post-PFA mapping demonstrated complete SVC isolation. However, conduction recurred following adenosine triphosphate administration, and ectopic activity originated from the SVC. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation was subsequently performed, achieving durable SVC isolation. Discussion: This case demonstrates that PFA of the RSPV can lead to incidental SVC isolation. The presence of adenosine-induced dormant conduction highlights the potential for late reconnection, while the observation of ectopic activity supports the need for adjunctive ablation. Pulsed field ablation may unintentionally affect adjacent myocardial tissue, including the SVC and components of the cardiac conduction system. Therefore, careful electrophysiological assessment and monitoring of conduction recovery are essential to prevent arrhythmogenic triggers and to ensure durable isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.