Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41696037›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026

Electrophysiological evaluation of incidental superior vena cava isolation following pulsed field ablation: a case report.

Shin Hasegawa, Taiji Miyake, Yoriaki Shinoda, Mutsumi Aoyama, Hitoshi Matsuo

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shin HasegawaDepartment of Cardiology, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabutaminami, Gifu City, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9828-0300
Taiji MiyakeDepartment of Cardiology, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabutaminami, Gifu City, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3438-7722
Yoriaki ShinodaDepartment of Clinical Engineering, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabutaminami, Gifu City, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.
Mutsumi AoyamaDepartment of Clinical Engineering, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabutaminami, Gifu City, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.
Hitoshi MatsuoDepartment of Cardiology, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabutaminami, Gifu City, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is increasingly adopted for atrial fibrillation (AF) due to its efficacy and lower risk of complications. However, uniform transmural energy delivery may induce excessive tissue modification and unintended effects on adjacent structures. Pulsed field ablation of the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) can result in conduction delay within the superior vena cava (SVC), but its electrophysiological properties remain poorly characterized. Case summary: An 81-year-old man with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, chronic heart failure, and paroxysmal AF underwent PFA for pulmonary vein isolation and posterior wall isolation. Pre-ablation mapping revealed myocardial sleeves within the SVC. Post-PFA mapping demonstrated complete SVC isolation. However, conduction recurred following adenosine triphosphate administration, and ectopic activity originated from the SVC. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation was subsequently performed, achieving durable SVC isolation. Discussion: This case demonstrates that PFA of the RSPV can lead to incidental SVC isolation. The presence of adenosine-induced dormant conduction highlights the potential for late reconnection, while the observation of ectopic activity supports the need for adjunctive ablation. Pulsed field ablation may unintentionally affect adjacent myocardial tissue, including the SVC and components of the cardiac conduction system. Therefore, careful electrophysiological assessment and monitoring of conduction recovery are essential to prevent arrhythmogenic triggers and to ensure durable isolation.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCase reportDormant conductionPulmonary vein isolationPulsed field ablationUnintended ablation

Identifiers

PMID41696037
PMCPMC12903455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.