ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Expanding the therapeutic landscape of minoxidil for androgenetic alopecia: topical, oral and sublingual formulations.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When Side Effects Become Therapies: A Mechanistic Taxonomy of Adverse Drug Reactions as Translational Signals for Drug Repositioning.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common form of non-scarring alopecia, affecting up to 80% of men and 50% of women by the age of 70. Minoxidil, initially developed as an oral antihypertensive, has become one of the most widely used therapies for AGA due to its safety and efficacy. This review presents an overview of current evidence on topical, oral and sublingual minoxidil. Topical minoxidil, the only FDA-approved treatment for AGA in both men and women, promotes hair growth through several proposed mechanisms described in the article. Randomised controlled trials show that 5% formulations consistently increase hair counts, although results vary due to differences in follicular sulfotransferase activity. Low-dose oral minoxidil (0.25-5 mg) has emerged as a practical option for patients unresponsive to topical therapy. Hypertrichosis is the most frequent adverse effect, while cardiovascular events are uncommon at low doses. Sublingual administration, a novel delivery route that bypasses first-pass metabolism, may enhance follicular bioavailability while limiting systemic exposure. Early evidence indicates similar efficacy to oral therapy, with a potentially lower risk of cardiovascular effects. Overall, topical minoxidil remains first line, while oral and sublingual formulations expand therapeutic options and support individualised management. Further large-scale, long-term studies are needed to define optimal dosing, confirm safety and determine whether sublingual administration offers consistent advantages over oral use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.