Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41695969›Full record

ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2026

Integrative Oncology Models of Care: Practice Patterns From NCCN Member Institutions.

Angela F Bazzell, Lydia T Madsen, Lindsey Bandini, Terry Harrington, Jonathan Siman, Charlene E Stein, Heather Greenlee, Jason B Fleming, Alexandra Huffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Angela F BazzellFrom Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Lydia T MadsenFrom Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Lindsey BandiniNational Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania.
Terry HarringtonNational Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania.
Jonathan SimanFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Charlene E SteinFrom Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Heather GreenleeFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Jason B FlemingFrom Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Alexandra HuffmanFrom Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Funding

UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Kathryn Ann O'Donnell · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with cancer frequently desire to incorporate integrative oncology (IO) practices into their care. However, patients are often uncertain about how to best access safe and effective IO practices and providers. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Best Practices Committee (BPC), in collaboration with a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, sought information regarding IO practices of NCCN Member Institutions. Methods: The BPC conducted a survey of NCCN Member Institution IO practices, which was distributed via a web-based survey tool to a representative at each center. Results were compiled using descriptive statistics. Results: Twenty-nine centers responded to the survey, with 100% of the responding institutions offering IO services. Services provided included nutritional/dietary services (97%), stress and anxiety management services (76%), mind-body practices (72%), physical therapy/occupational therapy (72%), acupressure/acupuncture (69%), and massage therapy (59%). While the mechanism for patient access varied, the most common was provider referral with some services available by self-scheduling. Twenty-one percent of centers used institutionally designed algorithms for referrals. Significant variation in funding for services existed between institutions, including combinations of self-pay, insurance-based, and philanthropically funded models. Conclusions: There was substantial variation in how NCCN Member Institutions deliver IO services. These results provide guidance for health-care organizations seeking to develop IO services and an opportunity to align best practices. As data were compiled solely from sites providing comprehensive cancer services, non-academic community settings may find similar implementation challenging. However, this information provides cancer providers insight into IO services most often sought by patients with cancer.

Identifiers

PMID41695969
PMCPMC12897409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.