ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026
Diagnostic challenges and treatment approaches for
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of fecal microbiota transplantation and its influencing factors.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Clostridioides difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: an observational study in flares of ulcerative colitis and a South Asian region-specific systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: This review critically examines the current evidence on the diagnosis and management of CDI in patients with IBD. Literature sources discussing diagnostic methodologies, therapeutic strategies, and preventive interventions were analyzed, with a focus on recent advances and their clinical applicability. Results: Diagnosing CDI in IBD remains difficult due to similar clinical presentations between infectious colitis and IBD flares, alongside limitations of stool assays, molecular tests, and endoscopic evaluations. Emerging diagnostic tools may enhance the accuracy and timeliness of detection. Standard therapies, antibiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) remain essential; however, their application requires individualization, taking into account immunosuppressive therapy, drug interactions, and the risk of recurrence. Treatment outcomes are further influenced by disease severity and patterns of antimicrobial resistance. Preventive strategies, including antimicrobial stewardship, probiotics, and vaccination, may help reduce the incidence of CDI among patients with IBD. Conclusion: CDI in IBD necessitates a personalized management approach that incorporates accurate diagnostics, targeted therapy, and preventive measures. Despite therapeutic advances, significant knowledge gaps persist regarding host microbiome interactions and the optimization of individualized treatment. Future research should focus on improving diagnostic precision and developing personalized medicine strategies to enhance outcomes for IBD patients affected by CDI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.