ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Risk prediction for chronic atrophic gastritis using a random forest model: A multicenter study.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is a significant precancerous condition of gastric cancer (GC). CAG often lacks typical symptoms in its early stages, and clinical diagnosis relies on gastroscopy and pathological examination, which are invasive and have limitations such as poor patient compliance. Therefore, developing a noninvasive, simple, and generalizable prediction tool is crucial for the early identification of CAG.
aimTo construct and validate a CAG risk prediction model to achieve noninvasive and accurate identification of high-risk patients.
methodsThis study included 1268 subjects from a GC screening program. Multimodal data, including serological marker, demographic, lifestyle, and family history data, were collected. Subjects were grouped by pathological biopsy results. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used for feature selection. A model was constructed using the random forest algorithm, evaluated with metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), and interpreted using the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method. The model was validated in an independent external cohort, and a web-based prediction platform was developed using Shiny.
resultsSix key features were ultimately included: Age,
conclusionThe random forest-based CAG prediction model is a highly accurate and interpretable tool with significant clinical utility in early screening and identifying high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.