ReviewSpine surgery and related research2026
Outcomes of Surgical Intervention of Dystrophic Cervical Kyphosis in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Systematic Review.
Review in Spine surgery and related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal deformities occur in 10 to 77% of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) cases. The dystrophic type of NF1 progresses rapidly and can cause severe neurological complications if left untreated. Surgical intervention is necessary, as bracing is ineffective. Although the joint anterior-posterior (AP) approach provides better correction than single approaches, it carries higher surgical risks, leading to an ongoing debate about optimal treatment strategies. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across the Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases from inception to June 2024. Data on clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, radiological and functional outcomes, and complications were systematically collected and synthesized in a narrative format. Results: Six studies involving 124 patients were analyzed, comprising five case series and one retrospective observational study. The AP approach showed better correction outcomes than the anterior-only (AO) and posterior-only approaches. All surgical approaches resulted in significant functional improvements, as reflected by increased Japanese Orthopaedic Association/modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, decreased Visual Analog Scale scores, and reduced Neck Disability Index scores. However, the AP approach was associated with a higher incidence of complications, while the AO approach had the lowest incidence. Conclusions: Existing evidence demonstrates that the AP approach leads to a better degree of correction than the AO or posterior-only approaches, despite higher complication rates. The dual mechanism of anterior reconstruction and posterior stabilization effectively addresses the challenges associated with dystrophic cervical kyphosis in patients with NF1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.