ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2026
Clinical features of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer and real-world multi-scale correlation analysis.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) remains an important issue in endoscopic examination. This study investigates the clinical features of PCCRC and possible correlation factors.
aimTo explore clinical features of PCCRC and correlation factors.
methodsA retrospective cohort analysis enrolled patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC)
resultsAmong 5411 colonoscopies in 2047 CRC patients, 66 prior examinations (27 colonoscopies in 17 non-PCCRC patients; 39 colonoscopies in 25 PCCRC patients) failed to establish diagnosis. The overall miss rate was 1.2%, with a PCCRC rate of 0.7%. Compared to the non-PCCRC group, advanced age was significantly associated with PCCRC (
conclusionThe incidence of PCCRC remains significant. Beyond tumor characteristics, endoscopist proficiency and procedural factors critically impact detection accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.