ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2026
Comparing efficacy of a jejunostomy tube
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic surgery is highly invasive and associated with prolonged postoperative recovery. Safe, effective postoperative nutritional support is essential for patient recovery. The impact of two modes of nutritional support-jejunostomy tube (JT) and nasojejunal tube (NJT), on recovery after resolution of novel coronavirus infection has been rarely reported.
aimTo compare the effects of JT with those of NJT after pancreatectomy.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 60 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery between January 2023 and May 2025 and classified them into an NJT group (
resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed in sex, age, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin level, or preoperative jaundice status between the two groups; postoperative pathologic type, incidence of delayed gastric emptying, time to transoral feeding, and time to defecation also did not differ (
conclusionThe use of JT for nutritional support after pancreatectomy is safe and effective, significantly reducing complication incidence and shortening postoperative length of stay; therefore, it is worthy of clinical selection and standardized use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.