ArticleInternational health trends and perspectives2025
Examining the profile of couples attending a violence prevention intervention: A dyadic latent profile analysis.
Article in International health trends and perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Existing research points to how increasing male engagement in public health interventions without addressing gender inequities can perpetuate power imbalances in a relationship which may lead to increased stress and anxiety for women. The aim of this study was to identify profiles of couples who attended a violence prevention intervention based on their attitudes toward gender norms and power sharing within a couple, determine if these profiles have different women's mental health outcome and examine whether male engagement moderates this relationship. Methods: Using data from a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo, we conducted a latent profile analysis to categorize different profiles amongst couples in the intervention (n=202) and conduct logistic regression to examine the study aims. Results: The latent profile analysis identified three profiles of couples: (1) discordant dyads, (2) concordant high gender equity dyads, and (3) concordant average dyads. There were no differences in women's depression symptoms at the end of the intervention amongst the three profiles. Male engagement, measured through attendance data, did not moderate the relationship between the couple's relationship profile and women's mental health. Conclusion: Small sample size, measurement sensitivity, and potential response bias to the scales assessing gender norms, power dynamics and mental well-being might have led to the null results we see. Yet, future studies should further explore the potential for differences in mental health outcomes and the impact of interventions on these outcomes based on intercouple dynamics in understanding and expression of power and gender norms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.