ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025
Beyond vascular recanalization: precision medicine in cervical artery dissection guided by multiple mechanisms and multimodal imaging for brain functional recovery.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical artery dissection (CAD), a critical etiological contributor of stroke in young adults, exerts direct influence on neurological prognosis through its vascular recanalization outcomes. However, pathological heterogeneity and ongoing controversies surrounding treatment strategies hinder the optimization of clinical decision-making; its prognosis is often not favorable. At present, there are a relative paucity of studies on recanalization of CAD. This review provides a concise overview of the pathological mechanisms and clinical challenges associated with CAD, along with recent advancements in advanced imaging modalities and clinico-anatomical classification systems. Furthermore, we critically evaluate current therapeutic paradigms and factors influencing recanalization while elucidating potential biological mechanisms underlying vascular restoration. A systematic analysis of translational utility in animal models is presented. Finally, based on the latest research progress in CAD and vessel recanalization, prospects are outlined aiming to establish a theoretical foundation for developing personalized and precise therapeutic approaches targeting CAD recanalization from multidimensional perspectives, and to offer reference for subsequent research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.