ReviewWorld journal of orthopedics2026
Orthopedic trinity: Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and regenerative orthopedics.
Review in World journal of orthopedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal conditions are among the leading causes of disability worldwide, necessitating the development of effective, specialized treatment approaches. In response, orthopedic practice has evolved into three distinct specialties: Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and regenerative orthopedics. Each domain represents a fundamentally different approach to musculoskeletal care: Arthroscopy addresses structural pathology through surgical intervention, sports medicine optimizes function through rehabilitation, and regenerative orthopedics modulates healing through biological therapies. These distinct methodologies serve different patient populations and clinical scenarios, requiring specialized training, equipment, and expertise. This review explores the historical evolution, unique therapeutic modalities, and independent clinical applications of these three fields, with emphasis on the Indian orthopedic landscape. Through a narrative synthesis of literature indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and peer-reviewed Indian sources, we delineate specific indications, outcome metrics, and innovations unique to each specialty. The future of orthopedic care lies not in forced integration but in the strategic application of the most appropriate specialty for each clinical scenario, ensuring optimal resource utilization and maintaining clinical excellence within each distinct discipline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.