ReviewWorld journal of orthopedics2026
Early dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty: Evaluation of treatment options following closed reduction.
Review in World journal of orthopedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a very successful orthopedic operation with high long-term survival rates, some failures may occur and considerably influence the final outcome. Early dislocation following primary THA is a rare but challenging complication, which may affect functional recovery and patient satisfaction, especially in case of recurrence. Moreover, it is one of the most common reasons for revision, and is associated with substantial social, health, and economic costs. The aim is to critically review the current evidence on the management of early dislocation after primary THA, with particular focus on post-reduction treatment strategies and the role of immobilization techniques. Particular attention was given to the evidence base supporting various clinical approaches. The review highlights a lack of consensus regarding optimal post-reduction management. Several methods have been proposed, but most are supported by limited data and small case series. Comparative studies are scarce, and clinical outcomes are inconsistent. Based on current findings, the recommended post-reduction management practice remains controversial, but the effectiveness of immobilization in preventing recurrence is not supported by clinical evidence, and therefore should be avoided. Further high-quality studies are needed to establish standardized, evidence-based protocols that can improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.