ArticlePeerJ2026
Prediction of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer based on machine learning.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third most frequently diagnosed cancer. Early diagnosis and precise risk assessment for lymph node metastasis (LNM) of T1 CRC, characterized by tumor confined to the mucosa and submucosa, essential for enhancing patient outcomes and informing therapeutic strategies. This project aims to use machine learning in refining clinical decision-making processes for T1 CRC patients, thereby laying the groundwork for more personalized and efficacious treatment protocols. Methods: In this study, we analyzed data from 210 patients with T1 CRC who underwent surgical resection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from 2017 to 2023. The datasets encompassed clinical, endoscopic, and pathological parameters, which were examined to identify potential predictors of LNM. A range of machine learning algorithms, including boosted trees, decision trees, logistic regression, multilayer perceptron (MLP), naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbors (K-NN), random forest and support vector machine (SVM), were leveraged to construct a predictive model for LNM in T1 CRC. Results: Our research demonstrated that the random forest algorithm outperformed other models in predictive performance for the risk of LNM. Furthermore, the model identified seven key risk factors associated with LNM. We found four novel LNM predictive indicators for T1 CRC: tumor submucosal invasion area, percentage of tumors with invasive carcinoma, poorly differentiated tumor cell clusters, and serrated lesions. Conclusion: This study developed a risk predictive model for LNM in T1 CRC patients by utilizing eight machine learning algorithms. Four novel predictive indicators were identified, improving the accuracy of LNM prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.