ArticlePeerJ2026
Evaluation of problems encountered in daily living activities by ındividuals with colostomy: use of the Visual Analog Scale.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colostomy is a surgical intervention that affects physical and psychological health and can cause difficulties in areas such as personal care, hygiene, nutrition, mobility, and social interactions. Purpose: To determine the severity of difficulties encountered in daily living activities by individuals with colostomy and to examine in which activities they experience the most difficulty. Methods: The research was conducted with 94 patients using a cross-sectional and descriptive design based on the Model of Living. Data were collected using the "Patient Identification Information Form" and the "Daily Living Activities Difficulty Level Assessment Form" In the first stage, the "Patient Identification Information Form" was administered to the patients, and the "Daily Living Activities Difficulty Level Assessment Form" was introduced. In the second stage, patients were contacted by telephone 15 days after discharge, and the difficulties they experienced in daily living activities were evaluated within the framework of the Daily Living Model using scores ranging from 0 to 10. Results: Patients experienced the most difficulty in areas such as excretion (8.0 ± 0.9) and anxieties about death and the future, quality of life, and meeting spiritual needs (7.0 ± 0.6), while activities with moderate difficulty were eating and drinking (4.0 ± 0.8), personal hygiene (6.0 ± 0.7), and sleep-rest (6.0 ± 0.5). The activities with the least difficulty were determined to be respiration (1.0 ± 0.4) and maintaining body temperature (2.0 ± 0.6). Patients with a higher level of education experienced less difficulty in sexual life activities. Single patients experienced less difficulty in providing a safe environment and engaging in work-leisure activities compared to married patients. Patients with temporary stomas reported experiencing less difficulty in eating and drinking activities compared to those with permanent stomas. Conclusion: The study found that the daily living activities of patients with colostomy are affected at different levels. These findings emphasize the importance of a holistic care approach addressing the physical and psychosocial needs of individuals with stomas. Future research should evaluate specific interventions aimed at improving the quality of life of these individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.