Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41695687›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2026

Prospects of feed additive incorporation in laying hen diets: a narrative review of principal biological effects and recent developments.

Elijah Ogola Oketch, Jung Min Heo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elijah Ogola OketchDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-460X
Jung Min HeoDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-1320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selected feed additives (probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, phytogenics, feed enzymes, and organic acids) are reviewed for reported biological responses, and some recent developments when incorporated into laying hen diets. Several feed enzymes (phytase, carbohydrase, protease, and multi-enzymes) have been adopted to improve the nutritive quality of feedstuffs by mitigating inherent digestive function inefficiencies, complementing endogenous enzyme activity, and cleaving anti-nutritional factors abundant in vegetable-based poultry diets. Phytase use is targeted at hydrolyzing phytate to liberate phosphorus and possibly other encapsulated nutrients, with widely reported environmental and economic benefits. Proteases often improve the hydrolysis of amino acids and protein complexes to improve dietary protein digestibility and utilization, potentially restoring performance losses and maintaining the egg quality of hens fed low-protein diets whose CP level has been further reduced. The digestibility-enhancing effects of fiber-degrading carbohydrases are associated with the reduction of intestinal viscosity and improved energy utilization through depolymerization of soluble non-starch polysaccharides. Considering that nutrients exist in a complex matrix involving starch and non-starch polysaccharides, protein, lipids, minerals, and vitamins, laying hens could also benefit from potential additive and synergistic effects accrued from adopting defined feed enzyme combinations. The incorporation of gut-health-promoting feed additives (pre, pro, syn- and postbiotics, phytogenics, organic acids) optimizes feed nutrient utilization by inducing immuno-stimulatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities, modulating gut immune function, and microbial balance and population. Hen responses to feed additives are context-dependent and highly variable due to various factors, including rearing system, age, breed, health status, environmental factors, feed composition and quality, and management. However, on balance, feed additive products with proven efficacy and financial value are recommended for inclusion in laying hen diets; and could potentiate optimized performance and egg quality, reduced feed costs, improved animal welfare and skeletal health, and reduced environmental stress due to nutrient excretion, thereby improving the economic and environmental sustainability of hen egg production. Strategic application of feed additive combinations could potentiate additive and synergistic responses.

Indexed as

Biological responsesEgg qualityFeed additivesLaying henPerformance

Identifiers

PMID41695687
PMCPMC12902584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.