ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2026
Effects of irradiation on microbiological safety and physicochemical properties of dry pet food.
Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of electron beam (EB) and X-ray (XR) irradiation on dry pet food during long-term storage. The samples were irradiated with EB and XR at doses of 0, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 kGy, and their microbial safety and quality/oxidation properties were analyzed over 56 days under storage conditions of 25°C and 70% relative humidity. As a result, total aerobic bacteria and yeasts and molds significantly decreased as the doses of EB and XR increased. When treated with 10 kGy for both irradiations, no bacteria were detected in the dry pet food, and this effect remained during the 56-day storage period. While EB and XR were effective in reducing aflatoxin B1 in solution, they showed limited effect on dry pet food. On the other hand, changes in quality traits such as proximate compositions, pH, water activity, color, and volatile basic nitrogen due to EB and XR were negligible. However, both types of irradiation induced lipid and protein oxidation in dry pet food. Also, a significant increase was observed in oxidation-related volatile compounds such as hydrocarbons, aldehydes, and ketones with EB and XR treatment, which suggested these changes could potentially impact the flavor of the dry pet food. The current findings confirm the efficient microbial reduction of dry pet food by EB and XR and the consequent changes in quality and oxidative properties. Future research should focus on sensory evaluations to understand the implications of these oxidized substances on pet preferences and explore potential methods to mitigate negative effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.