ArticleInternational journal of women's dermatology2026
Assessing workload, compensation, and burnout in academic dermatology: a national multi-institutional survey study.
Article in International journal of women's dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Academic dermatologists manage a broad array of responsibilities, often extending beyond clinical duties to include education, research, mentorship, and administrative work. Objective: This study aimed to quantify the scope of paid and unpaid responsibilities among academic dermatologists in the United States and identify disparities based on gender, career stage, and geography. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 63 board-certified academic dermatologists from 12 institutions collected data on demographics, workweek allocation, after-hours tasks, compensation, burnout, and resilience from January to May 2025. Results: Respondents reported spending 58.3% of their time on clinical care, 15.9% on administrative duties, 13.8% on education, and 11.9% on research. Nearly half received 11 to 50 daily patient messages via the clinical inbox, and over 80% took hospital call duties, with most receiving no extra compensation. Burnout affected 63.5% of respondents and was significantly more prevalent among women, early-career physicians, and those in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions. Resilience scores were lower among women. Consulting opportunities, often associated with supplemental income and career advancement, were more common among male and senior physicians. Parental leave policies were inconsistently applied and poorly understood; nearly 20% of respondents had 8 or fewer weeks of paid parental leave. Limitations: Study limitations include the relatively small sample size and overrepresentation of the Northeast region, potentially hindering generalizability. Additionally, no significant race-based differences were observed, which may be due to insufficient sample sizes within comparator groups. Conclusion: These findings highlight the cumulative burden of undercompensated labor, inadequate institutional support, and gender disparities in workload and opportunity. Structural changes in compensation transparency, workload distribution, recognition of academic labor, and support for early-career and female physicians are essential to fostering sustainability and equity within academic dermatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.