ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2025
COVID Stress & Mental Health Among Sexually Diverse Couples.
Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: It is now well-established that the COVID-19 pandemic had profound mental health impacts that were not distributed equally throughout all portions of the US population. In this study, we used mental health and COVID stress data from the National Couples' Health and Time (NCHAT) study to test the differential impact of COVID stress on key indicators of mental health (e.g., depression, anxiety) among sexually diverse couples. Methods: We leveraged a sample of N=1515 couples (3030 individuals) from the NCHAT study, who filled out self-report measures of COVID stress (e.g., concerns about acquiring COVID, immunocompromised household members), depression, anxiety, general stress, emotion regulation, and positive/negative coping behaviors in 2020 and 2021. These data were submitted to a series of constrained latent variable actor-partner interdependence models. Results: COVID stress had widespread impacts on mental health problems for groups identifying as gay/lesbian, straight, and plurisexual. However, people identifying as plurisexual (e.g., bisexual, pansexual) and their partners tended to experience: 1) a stronger COVID stress-anxiety association compared to people identifying as gay/lesbian and straight and 2) tended to be more dissimilar with their partners on mental health. Conclusions: These results imply unique impacts of COVID stress among subgroups of people identifying as plurisexual and their partners, as well as prevention approaches for further study. Policy Implications: Our study suggests that reliance on one's romantic partner may be key to incorporate in future public health messaging yet may not be as beneficially impactful for all groups (e.g., people identifying as plurisexuals).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.