ArticleCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR2026
How can the collaboration between manufacturers of medical devices and bedside clinicians lead to improved applications of the devices?
Article in Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In late 2019, the leaders of a respiratory department at an academic medical center (AMC) in the Southeastern United States (U.S.) decided to change the humidity delivered to patients via invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation from passive to active in the intensive care units (ICUs). The AMC purchased the humidifiers that were new in the U.S. market. The manufacturer provided education and training. Almost a year after implementation, the leaders found the humidifiers turned off or on standby, with a heat moisture exchanger (HME) placed in-line and a water trap by the expiratory filter. Approach: The leaders requested help from the manufacturer. The manufacturer sent its clinical specialist (CS) twice to the AMC to re-educate and re-train in real time at the bedside. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were implemented to troubleshoot problems and improve adherence to active humidity. Findings: The respiratory therapists (RTs) did not recall the appropriate steps for setting up the heaters. Instead of asking the leaders for help, the RTs took it upon themselves to turn off the humidifiers, use HMEs, and add a water trap by the expiratory filter to collect excess humidity in the circuit and reduce the need for frequent expiratory filter changes. In addition, other issues were discovered during the process. Those issues exacerbated the alarm situations. Discussion: A knowledge gap and a breakdown in communication led to inappropriate use of humidifiers and the implementation of active humidity in the ICUs. PDSA cycles and the involvement of the manufacturer's CS in real-time training and troubleshooting at the bedside resulted in the intended outcomes. Conclusion: The process was a learning experience for both the bedside clinicians and the manufacturer. The process led to improvements in the heater's design, its placement on the ventilator cart, the circuit design, and the development of educational materials to guide clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.