SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Meta-analysis for the associations of serum C-reactive protein with delirium risk.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathophysiology and biomarkers of delirium in older adults-Narrative review.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Review
- From Sensory Deprivation to Psychosis: Environmental Mechanisms of Delirium in Dementia-An Eight-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Case Report and Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical and Inflammatory Determinants of Postoperative Delirium After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 962 Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Inflammatory Biomarkers and Delirium Severity in Critically Ill Adults: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Sedation as an Immunomodulator of Inflammatory Responses in the Lung-Brain Axis of ARDS.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and delirium risk, encompassing postoperative delirium (POD) and delirium secondary to other medical conditions. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database. The odds ratio (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) from each study were extracted and used to estimate the effects. Meta-regression analysis was utilized to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were applied to explore the association under different disease types (POD vs. non-POD), and age groups (>70 years or ≤70 years) among delirium patients. Results: A total of 9,002 patients from 32 included studies were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Of these, 21 studies comprising 5,006 patients examined the association of CRP with delirium using continuous data, while 11 studies involving 3,996 patients employed categorical data by dividing patients into high and low groups based on the CRP value. The pooled data from continuous data showed that CRP levels were significantly associated with delirium (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20, Conclusion: Elevated serum CRP levels are significantly but modestly associated with delirium risk in diverse clinical populations. Given the observational nature of the included studies and high heterogeneity, these findings support CRP as a correlate, rather than a causal mediator, of delirium-related inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.