ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Deep learning-based prediction of TERT mutation status from MRI for glioma molecular subtyping.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model based on preoperative MRI to non-invasively predict Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation status in glioma patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 100 patients with histologically confirmed high-grade glioma was included. Regions of interest (VOIs) were manually annotated on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI sequences by senior radiologists. Five deep learning models (RegNet, GhostNet, MobileNet, ResNeXt50, ShuffleNet) were trained and evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The dataset was split into training (80%) and internal validation (20%) sets. Results: RegNet achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 0.7742, recall of 0.8704, precision of 0.7163, and F1-score of 0.7023. It demonstrated superior ability to capture imaging features associated with TERT mutations compared to other models. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for RegNet was 0.7182, indicating moderate discriminative power. Conclusion: The RegNet model effectively predicts TERT promoter mutation status from routine MRI, offering a non-invasive tool for preoperative molecular subtyping of glioma. This approach may facilitate personalized treatment planning and address limitations of invasive tissue-based diagnostics. Further validation with multi-center data is warranted to enhance clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.