Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41695595›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters

Generating Job Recommendations for People With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder Using Gemini 2.0 Flash and Claude Sonnet 4: An Exploratory Analysis.

Maximin Lange, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Ben Carter, Ricardo Twumasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maximin LangeInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-8741
Nikolaos KoutsoulerisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6825-6262
Ben CarterInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0318-8865
Ricardo TwumasiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0194-7250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Employment is a crucial part of recovery for individuals with severe mental illness. Individual placement and support (IPS) is the gold standard for vocational rehabilitation, yet IPS reaches only a fraction of who could benefit. Large language models (LLMs) have been proposed as potential tools for vocational guidance, but their utility for vulnerable populations is unknown. We conducted an analysis of LLM-generated job recommendations for individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and for a matched control cohort without psychiatric diagnoses. We used discharge summaries from 450 patients with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder and 50 control cases in the MIMIC-IV database, fitting three independent job recommendations per case with Gemini 2.0 Flash and Claude Sonnet 4. Recommendations were summarised as a frequency and LLM-automated content analysis was used to analyse reasoning patterns, workplace accommodations, and alignment with supported employment principles. Both, Gemini and Claude, showed little diversity and strong bias toward entry-level roles. In the schizophrenia cohort, Gemini mostly recommended data entry and other clerical jobs while Claude produced a similarly narrow pattern with the majority suggesting library-related. The controls revealed comparable clustering, with Gemini defaulting to clerical work and medical secretary roles, and Claude to customer service. There was limited diversity in the role settings, which almost uniformly suggested flexible schedules and minimal social interaction. Nor was there diversity in how roles were tailored to patient strengths, qualifications, or prior experience; instead, demographic stereotypes such as age-based framing, gendered role allocation, and assumptions about language skills often shaped the recommendations. Based on our data and procedures, preliminary evidence does not support immediate deployment of LLMs for job recommendations for the tested population; further evaluation is needed after integrating human oversight and bias-mitigation steps.

Indexed as

patient rehabilitationpatient treatmentpersonnelweb services

Identifiers

PMID41695595
PMCPMC12894053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.