ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Artificial intelligence-enhanced ECG score for perioperative risk assessment in non-cardiac surgery.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The role of electrocardiography (ECG) has been limited in the preoperative risk evaluation in noncardiac surgery due to its low prognostic value. We aimed to evaluate the utility of an AI-enabled ECG (QCG-Critical score) in predicting 30-day postoperative mortality in non-cardiac surgery and compare its performance with traditional perioperative risk-assessment tools. Methods and results: A retrospective cohort of 46 135 adults who underwent non-cardiac surgery at a tertiary centre between 2020 and 2021 was analysed. Preoperative ECG images acquired within 30 days before surgery were used as input to previously developed CNN-based deep-learning algorithm to generate QCG-Critical score that reflects the risk for critical illness. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, which occurred in 0.34% of patients. Individuals with QCG-Critical scores >40 had a markedly higher mortality rate of 11.7%. The QCG-Critical score demonstrated strong predictive performance for 30-day mortality (AUROC: 0.909), outperforming the ESC surgical category (0.728) and RCRI (0.725), and was comparable to the ASA classification (0.886). The performance of QCG-Critical score remained consistent across subgroups stratified by age, sex, emergency operation, anaesthesia type, and conventional risk groups. The QCG-Critical score also demonstrated good performance for predicting 7-day mortality (AUROC: 0.933), unplanned PCI (0.857), prolonged mechanical ventilation (0.829), and presumed heart failure (0.774). Conclusion: The preoperative QCG-Critical score accurately predicted postoperative mortality and other adverse outcomes, outperforming conventional risk-stratification tools. The QCG-Critical score may serve as a fast, accessible, and integrable tool for perioperative risk assessments in routine surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.