ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Computed tomography-derived biomechanical simulations as a proof-of-concept tool for evaluating coronary dynamics in anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: We aim to explore whether biomechanical simulations can identify coronary compression sites and support pre-operative assessment as a proof-of-concept approach in subjects with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery. Methods and results: Patient-specific computer-aided engineering models of the aortic root and coronary arteries were developed from computed tomography scans of subjects with anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries, retrospectively evaluated to include variants with and without an intramural segment. The fixed and dynamic components of stenosis were assessed by simulating blood pressure from rest to extreme effort and by retrieving the percentage of narrowing of the proximal anomalous lumen with reference to the distal segment. Patients were classified as potential candidates for surgery if the degree of stenosis was >50% in any of the simulated pressure scenarios. A total of 31 patients (19 with interarterial course and intramural segment, 12 with non-intramural course) were simulated. Simulations showed promising trends of agreement with retrospective clinical treatment decisions (13 aligned with surgery, 11 aligned with non-surgical management). This concordance with surgical decisions should not be interpreted as validation for predicting myocardial ischaemia. Conclusion: Computational models of the anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery have not yet been routinely introduced into the clinical setting. Our method demonstrates potential as a proof-of-concept tool for identifying coronary compression-prone regions and estimating stenosis severity, but further studies are needed to validate its diagnostic and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.