Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41695533›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Optimising plant growth, biomass partitioning, and nitrogen use efficiency in taro (

Laura Steel, Diogenes L Antille, Roslyn M Gleadow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura SteelSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Diogenes L AntilleCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Roslyn M GleadowSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Taro ( Methods: Taro plants were grown using nutrient solutions with N concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 20 mM N. Plants were harvested at different growth stages up to 10 months to capture corm formation, filling, maturity and post-maturity stages. Biomass and nutrient concentrations were measured and nitrogen use efficiency indices were calculated. Results: The highest overall biomass was at 15 mM N, but corm biomass was highest in plants grown at the 5 and 10 mM N treatments. Sucker number and biomass increased with N concentration. Calcium concentration showed a strong positive correlation with N in corms but a weak negative correlation in leaves. Discussion/conclusion: Hypotheses 2 and 3 were supported; Hypothesis 1 was not. The optimal N level for maximizing corm biomass without compromising nutritional quality is around 10 mM N. These findings will inform biophysical models for taro to help its development as a food and nutrition security crop.

Indexed as

aroid liliescalcium oxalateclimate change adaptationcormfood securityPacific Islandsraphidesresource allocation

Identifiers

PMID41695533
PMCPMC12894226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.