ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Socioeconomic status does not influence quality of life and mood outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: A call for equitable access.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies indicate that socioeconomic status (SES) is a determinant of successful rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data relating specifically to ablation outcomes are lacking. Objective: We sought to investigate the relationship between SES and AF ablation outcomes. Methods: Participants enrolled in 2 multicenter randomized trials evaluating AF ablation outcomes were invited to participate in an SES survey. SES indicators collected included cultural and linguistic diversity, education, occupational skill, weekly income, and the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia index of social support. The impact of SES on AF-related quality of life (QoL) (primary outcome) and mood was evaluated with regression methods. Results: 159 patients provided consent and answers to the SES survey. The mean age was 62.8 ± 9.4 years, and 78% were male. In this cohort, 56.6% were treated in a public hospital; 40% completed a certificate, diploma, or degree; and 40% were in a highly skilled occupation. The interquartile range of weekly income was $850-$2307. Median social support index was 59/70. Principal component analysis divided the cohort into SES quartiles. Mean 12-month change in standardized QoL score was 22.4 ± 30.4 (maximum score 100). There was a reduction in the 12-month anxiety/depression score of -4.8 ± 7.01 (maximum score 21). Median AF burden was 0% (0%-1.9%). These changes did not differ across SES quartiles. Conclusion: Across a wide spectrum of SES, AF ablation was highly effective for improvements in AF-related QoL and anxiety/depression. These improvements correlated with low AF burden after ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.