Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41695450›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

Livestock aggregated samples for monitoring viruses infecting animals and potentially zoonotic viral pathogens.

Marta Rusiñol, Sandra Martínez-Puchol, Diana Ribeiro, Júlia Verdaguer, Ona Torrejón-Llorens, Marta Itarte, Ignasi Estarlich-Landajo, Cristina Mejías-Molina, Gisela Juliachs-Torroella, Rosina Girones and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marta RusiñolLaboratory of Viruses Contaminants of Water and Food, Departament de Genètica. Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Sandra Martínez-PucholInstitut de Recerca de l'Aigua (IdRA), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Diana RibeiroLaboratory of Viruses Contaminants of Water and Food, Departament de Genètica. Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Júlia VerdaguerLaboratory of Viruses Contaminants of Water and Food, Departament de Genètica. Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Ona Torrejón-LlorensLaboratory of Viruses Contaminants of Water and Food, Departament de Genètica. Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Marta ItarteLaboratory of Viruses Contaminants of Water and Food, Departament de Genètica. Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Ignasi Estarlich-LandajoLaboratory of Viruses Contaminants of Water and Food, Departament de Genètica. Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Cristina Mejías-MolinaLaboratory of Viruses Contaminants of Water and Food, Departament de Genètica. Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Gisela Juliachs-TorroellaLaboratory of Viruses Contaminants of Water and Food, Departament de Genètica. Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Rosina GironesLaboratory of Viruses Contaminants of Water and Food, Departament de Genètica. Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Gustavo A RamírezDepartment of Animal Science (ETSEA), Universitat de Lleida-AGROTECNIO-CERCA Centre, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.
Jordi BaliellasGrup de Sanejament Porcí (GSP), Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.
Silvia Bofill-MasLaboratory of Viruses Contaminants of Water and Food, Departament de Genètica. Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Xavier Fernández-CassiLaboratory of Microorganisms of Interest in Food and Animal Safety, Departament de Biologia, Sanitat i Medi Ambient, Facultat de Farmàcia i Ciències de l'Alimentació, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active surveillance of livestock pathogens is essential to prevent animal health losses and zoonotic spillover. This study evaluted aggregated environmental sampling as a non-invasive approach for monitoring swine- and cattle-associated viruses across farms and slaughterhouses, bridging the gap between agricultural biosecurity and public health. Over eleven months, 105 samples, including swine slurry, cattle manure, farm air, and slaughterhouse wastewater, were collected and analyzed using pathogen-specific (RT) qPCR and targeted viral metagenomics. Seasonal and sample patterns were evident, with higher detection of rotavirus A (RoV-A) and bovine coronavirus (BCoV) in slurry and wastewater during winter, and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) and transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) sporadicly in slaughterhouse wastewater. Farm slurry or manure were optimal for enteric viruses such as RoV-A or hepatitis E virus (HEV), and farm air proved valuable for respiratory viruses like BCoV. Targeted sequencing identified a broader viral community, revealing up to 80% of total detected viral species in slaughterhouse wastewater alone. Frequent detection of porcine bocavirus, circoviruses and astrovirus, alongside zoonotic viruses such as HEV and porcine bufavirus (PBuV), underscored the environmental transmission risk at the human-animal interface. Sequencing also uncovered viruses of unclear pathogenicity, including kobuvirus and copiparvovirus, underscoring the complexity of the livestock virome and the potential for emerging viral threats. Slaughterhouse wastewater consistently captured the highest viral richness, integrating inputs from multiple farms and regions, while farm air samples yielded lower diversity but detected respiratory (astrovirus, caliciviruses) and persistent viruses (papillomaviruses, polyomaviruses). Aggregated sampling proved particularly efficient in swine systems, while cattle surveillance may require adapted strategies due to lower stocking densities and greater ventilation. This work demonstrates the novelty and value of aggregated environmental samples, collected at different points in the production chain, as strategic One Health sentinels. This scalable, practical approach supports early warning and control of animal and zoonotic diseases, directly contributing to One Health surveillance.

Indexed as

Livestock viral pathogensOne HealthViral fecal indicatorsWastewater surveillanceZoonotic spillover

Identifiers

PMID41695450
PMCPMC12905743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.