ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2025
Animal bites presenting in the pediatric emergency department at Al Qassimi Women's and Children's Hospital: a cross-sectional study.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinic-based characteristics of animal-related injury presentations in Hangzhou, China: a 10-year retrospective analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal bites represent a major public health concern that frequently goes underreported. Dogs and cats are the most common culprits. This study aims to gather comprehensive data on patients with animal bites who visited Al Qassimi Women's and Children's Hospital (AQWCH) in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The research method involves a retrospective chart review of children under 13 years old who visited the hospital's Emergency Department (ED) with a history of animal bites between January 2018 and September 2023. The study aims to identify the high-risk groups for such incidents and provide valuable insights into demographics, types, and locations of animal bites, as well as clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of patients. The majority of patients were male 708 (58%), and domestic animals 701 (72%), particularly cats 1003 (82.08%), were the primary cause of bites. Scratches were the most common type of injury, 942 (77.21%), and often occurred after provocation, 95.5%, with the right upper limb being the most affected, 492 (44.40%). The majority of patients received the rabies vaccine 1030 (84%), and no cases of rabies were recorded during the study period. In conclusion, cat and dog bites make up the majority of animal bites, and the study provides crucial insights into the characteristics and patterns of such incidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.