Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41695385›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025

From learned helplessness to motor recovery: integrating intensive neurorehabilitation in poststroke spastic paresis-clinical insights from over 10 years of practice.

Ibrahim Npochinto Moumeni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ibrahim Npochinto MoumeniDepartment of Physical Therapy & Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, West Region, Cameroon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Poststroke spastic paresis represents a dual pathology combining neurological impairment and secondary muscle contracture, often perpetuated by learned non-use. Current rehabilitation approaches frequently address these components separately, limiting functional recovery potential. Methods: This perspective synthesizes over 10 years of clinical experience treating poststroke spastic paresis across European and sub-Saharan African settings, integrating constraint-induced movement therapy with progressive muscle-lengthening protocols. Clinical insights are drawn from over 300 patients treated in both resource-rich and resource-limited environments. Results: The integrated approach demonstrates superior outcomes compared with conventional therapy, with patients showing functional improvements even years after stroke. Key success factors include intensive training protocols, systematic antagonist muscle stretching, and patient-centered motivation strategies adapted to diverse cultural contexts. European validation and African implementation confirm universal applicability. Conclusion: Combining neuroplasticity-based interventions with muscle-targeted therapies offers a paradigm shift in poststroke rehabilitation. This approach proves effective across diverse healthcare settings, from high-technology European centers to resource-limited African hospitals, relying on intensive human intervention and evidence-based protocols.

Indexed as

constraint-induced therapycross-cultural rehabilitationlearned non-usemuscle plasticityneuroplasticityspastic paresisstroke rehabilitationtherapeutic intensity

Identifiers

PMID41695385
PMCPMC12901396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.