SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Best evidence summary on sexual health management for patients undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy for gynecological neoplasms.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translating Evidence into Obstetric Care: Developing a Best Practice-Informed Stepped-Care Clinical Algorithm for the Management of Gestational Insomnia.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically retrieve, appraise and synthesize the best available evidence on sexual health management in patients undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer, so as to provide an evidence-based foundation for developing individualized sexual-health care plans in clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive computer-based search of domestic and foreign databases, guideline repositories and professional association websites was conducted for all evidence on sexual health management in cervical-cancer patients receiving intracavitary brachytherapy. Document types included guidelines, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, expert consensus statements and clinical decision aids. The search timeframe spanned database inception to June 2025. Results: Twelve publications were ultimately included: two clinical decision aids, one guideline, four systematic reviews, two evidence summaries, one expert consensus and two randomized controlled trials. Thirty-nine evidence statements were extracted and grouped under seven themes: target population and risk factors, screening and assessment, health education, non-pharmacologic interventions, pharmacologic and hormonal therapies, special treatments, and follow-up. Conclusion: This study summarizes the best current evidence on sexual health management for cervical-cancer patients undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy and offers valuable guidance for improving patients' quality of life and sexual-health outcomes. Systematic Review Registration: http://ebn.nursing.fudan.edu.cn/home, identifier ES20256976.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.