ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Real-world data-based assessment of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor treatment in ovarian cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have significantly improved outcomes in ovarian cancer. However, therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs) have emerged as rare but serious late complications. Although an increased incidence of t-MNs has been reported following PARPi exposure, clinical predictors remain poorly understood. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 181 patients with ovarian cancer treated with PARPi at two Japanese institutions. Clinical characteristics and routine hematologic parameters were compared between patients with and without t-MNs. Hematological values were assessed at initial diagnosis, PARPi initiation, 4 weeks after initiation, and at nadir within 12 weeks. Relative changes from initial diagnosis and from PARPi initiation to nadir were also evaluated. Results: t-MNs developed in 6 (3.3%) patients. All patients in the t-MN group had received multiple platinum-containing regimens, and in five of the six cases, t-MN was diagnosed more than 5 years after initial diagnosis. No definitive clinical predictors were identified, although the t-MN group tended to have higher body mass index. Median white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin, and platelet counts, as well as their relative changes from initial diagnosis or PARPi initiation to nadir, did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the t-MN group exhibited a larger reduction in WBC count from PARPi initiation to nadir, not statistically significant. Conclusions: This real-world study highlights the importance of survivorship care in the era of improved outcomes for ovarian cancer. Continued long-term hematologic monitoring, along with the collection of more cases, is essential to elucidate risk factors for t-MNs in patients receiving PARPi therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.