ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
MRI-based habitat radiomics for predicting WHO/ISUP nuclear grade in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop an explainable fusion model that integrates intratumoral, peritumoral, and habitat features derived from MRI to evaluate its feasibility for predicting the WHO/ISUP nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 154 patients with pathologically confirmed ccRCC and partitioned them into a training set (n = 108) and an independent test set (n = 46). On contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, regions of interest were manually delineated layer-by-layer along the tumor margin and expanded outward by 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm and 5 mm to derive peritumoral regions. Tumor habitat regions were identified using the K-means clustering algorithm. After extraction and selection of radiomic features, radiomics and habitat models were constructed using five machine learning algorithms. These effective features were then integrated into a nomogram. Model performance was assessed by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the curve (AUC). Model calibration and clinical utility were evaluated using calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Model interpretability was enhanced by employing Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: Three habitat subregions were identified within tumors. The integrated habitat region(Habitat) model demonstrated the highest performance among the evaluated habitat models, with AUCs of 0.894 and 0.877 in the training and test sets, respectively. The Peri2mm model achieved AUCs of 0.884 and 0.839, outperforming other peritumoral ranges. Therefore, the 2-mm peritumoral margin was considered a potentially optimal analysis range in this cohort.When the integrated habitat region signature was combined with intratumoral features, 2-mm peritumoral features and the independent clinical predictor (corticomedullary enhancement level) in a nomogram, predictive performance was further improved, achieving AUCs of 0.934 and 0.912. SHAP bee swarm and force plots provided intuitive visualization of the habitat model's decision-making process. Conclusion: The nomogram, which integrates intratumoral, peritumoral and habitat radiomic features derived from MRI, demonstrated excellent performance for noninvasive preoperative prediction of WHO/ISUP nuclear grade in ccRCC and holds promise as an adjunctive tool for individualized therapy planning and prognostic assessment. However, its clinical application requires further external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.