Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41695303›Full record

ReviewDrugs in context2026

Emerging concepts in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: focus on twice-yearly lenacapavir.

Sarah L Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs in context, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sarah L AndersonPeerView Institute for Medical Education, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistent global burden of HIV and the need for more flexible, durable prevention strategies have accelerated the development of long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) options. Lenacapavir (LEN), a first-in-class capsid inhibitor, is approved as a twice-yearly subcutaneous injection for HIV prevention and represents a major advance beyond oral injectable PrEP regimens administered daily or every 2 months. Data from phase III trials demonstrate high efficacy, sustained drug levels and strong adherence potential, positioning LEN as a transformative option for individuals seeking long-acting protection. Its unique mechanism of action and extended dosing interval can address key barriers to PrEP uptake and persistence, particularly amongst populations disproportionately at risk for HIV. LEN may play a central role in expanding choice and improving the real-world effectiveness of PrEP. Ongoing considerations include implementation logistics, equitable access, potential drug resistance and integration into existing prevention frameworks. Twice-yearly LEN is a critical addition to the evolution of HIV prevention strategies.

Indexed as

antiviral agentsHIV infectionslenacapavirlong-acting pharmaceuticalspre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID41695303
PMCPMC12900279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.