Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41695260›Full record

ReviewBioinformatics advances2026

Empowering biological knowledgebases: advances in human-in-the-loop AI-driven literature curation.

Valerie Wood, Matt Jeffryes, Andrew F Green, Matthias Blum, Sandra Orchard, Simona Panni, Federica Quaglia, Raul Rodriguez-Esteban, James Seager, Silvio C E Tosatto and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Valerie WoodDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-7526
Matt JeffryesLiterature Services, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-6271
Andrew F GreenSequence Family Resources, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-0953
Matthias BlumSequence Family Resources, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5773-4724
Sandra OrchardProtein Function Content, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-3972
Simona PanniDepartment of Biology, Ecology and Earth Science, University of Calabria, Rende, 87036, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7500-4028
Federica QuagliaBiomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0341-4888
Raul Rodriguez-EstebanRoche Innovation Center Basel, Basel 4070, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9494-9609
James SeagerTranslating Biotic Interactions, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7487-610X
Silvio C E TosattoBiomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4525-7793
Ulrike WittigScientific Databases and Visualization, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg 69118, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9077-5664
Melissa HarrisonLiterature Services, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3523-4408

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological knowledgebases facilitate discovery across the life sciences by structuring experimental findings into human-readable and computable formats. These essential resources are maintained by a small number of professional biocurators worldwide and face combined chronic underfunding and the exponential growth of the literature. In this perspective, we review how artificial intelligence, particularly large language models and agentic systems, can augment literature-curation workflows. Applications include literature recommendation, entity recognition, data extraction, summarization, ontology development, and quality control with emphasis on published use cases at Global Core BioData Resources and ELIXIR Core Data Resources. We identify key challenges, including the scarcity of training data, difficulty in extracting complex relationships, and concerns about error propagation. To address these challenges, we propose a human-in-the-loop framework where generative artificial intelligence approaches accelerate routine tasks while curators provide critical evaluation and domain expertise. We also propose practical recommendations for the community, including the creation of shared benchmark datasets, harmonized evaluation frameworks, and best-practice guidelines for transparent human-in-the-loop AI deployment in biocuration. These synergistic partnerships will be critical to ensure biological rigour, accelerating knowledge integration while maintaining the quality essential for trusted biological resources.

Identifiers

PMID41695260
PMCPMC12904773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.