ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
Machine learning can distinguish orphans that have resulted from sequence divergence beyond recognition.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and Classification of Expressed Orphan Genes, Spurious Orphan Genes, and Conserved Genes in the Human Gut Microbiome.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Species-specific orphan genes lack homologues outside of a given taxon and frequently underlie unique species traits. Orphans can result from sequence divergence beyond recognition, when homologous proteins diverge to an extent at which sequence similarity search algorithms can no longer identify them as homologues, but they can also evolve de novo from previously noncoding sequences, in which case homologous protein-coding genes truly do not exist. Results: Here we propose that sequence divergent orphans might be recognizable from their patterns of non-statistically significant similarity hits which are typically discarded. To test this, we simulated diverged orphan protein sequences under varying parameters. Using reversed protein sequences as negative control, we trained machine learning classifiers on features extracted from similarity search output. We found that this approach works, but performance of the models depends on the simulation parameters, with ∼90% accuracy when the underlying simulated divergence was moderate and ∼70% when it is extreme. When applying our classifiers on a set of real orphans we found that ∼30% of them are predicted to be divergent and these are shorter and more disordered than the rest. Our work contributes to the effort of better understanding how genetic novelty arises. Availability and implementation: The models and data used can be found at https://github.com/emiliostassios/Classification-of-divergent-genes-using-ML.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.