ArticleJournal of central nervous system disease2026
Deriving a Simple Clinical Predictive Score for Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke (PCS-SCORE).
Article in Journal of central nervous system disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCS) accounts for up to 25% of all ischemic strokes but remains frequently under-recognized due to atypical symptoms and poor representation in conventional stroke scales. Early diagnosis is critical yet challenging. This study aimed to derive a pragmatic clinical scoring tool, the PCS-SCORE, to identify patients at high risk of PCS based solely on bedside features. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 5163 patients from a prospective stroke registry, including 1571 with -confirmed PCS. Key predictors were identified through multivariable logistic regression and lasso modeling. Variables were weighted according to regression coefficients and clinical relevance. The final PCS-SCORE (0-9 points) included: diabetes (1 point), hypertension (1), male sex (1), double/blurred vision (2), vertigo with vomiting (2), and incoordination (2). Results: At a score threshold >3, the PCS-SCORE achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76, with 87.9% specificity and 43.4% sensitivity. Raising the threshold to >4 increased specificity to 94.4% (sensitivity 27.9%). Higher scores corresponded with progressively increased likelihood of PCS, enabling confident identification of high-risk patients. Conclusion: The PCS-SCORE is a simple, highly specific bedside tool for early detection of posterior circulation strokes. Its rule-in strength makes it especially useful in prehospital settings, resource-limited environments, and crowded emergency departments. Prospective validation is ongoing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.