ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
The urethro-prostatic angle as a practical sonographic index for estimating prostatic size in dogs.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prostatomegaly is a common condition in adult, intact dogs. Abdominal ultrasonography is currently considered the method of choice for assessing the prostate size using volume-based formulas. However, objectively defining an enlarged prostate remains challenging, even for experienced operators. This is mainly due to the wide variability in dog sizes and the partially intrapelvic position of the gland, which can limit its complete visualization. This study aimed to explore the reliability of a new, practical, and less operator-dependent parameter, the urethro-prostatic angle (UPa), for estimating canine prostate volume via B-mode ultrasonography. Materials and methods: Sixty-three dogs were enrolled, and prostatic volume was assessed using the equation proposed by Ruel et al., which is based on measurements of the gland's length, height, and width obtained from sagittal and transverse scans. Furthermore, to distinguish between normal and enlarged prostates, a second Ruel formula, which includes age and body weight, was also applied. Results: The urethro-prostatic angle was successfully measured in all dogs and correlated significantly with prostate volume ( Conclusion: In contrast to traditional volume estimation methods, the measurement of the UPa is independent of canine body size, prostatic gland position, and operator skill. These findings suggest that the UPa is a promising, repeatable, and practical parameter for the reliable estimation of prostatomegaly in dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.