ArticleJHLT open2026
Expedited Lung Allocation in The Era of Continuous Distribution.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The frequency of use of expedited offers in lung allocation has increased. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed lung offers accepted for transplant in the United States for the period from the introduction of continuous distribution in allocation in March 2023 to March 2024 to identify characteristics of donors, recipients, and offers associated with expedited placement. Data were obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and categorized by expedited vs non-expedited offers. Results: Of the 3,136 lung organ offers transplanted, 9% (284) were expedited. Expedited offers were more likely for male donors with blood type O, while recipients were typically older, male, non-Hispanic, and diagnosed with lung condition category A. These recipients also demonstrated lower composite allocation and medical urgency scores, and were less likely to be hospitalized, ventilated, or on extracorporeal life support. Time on the waitlist and post-transplant 30-day survival rates were similar between expedited and non-expedited groups. One-year survival was higher in recipients of expedited lung placements. Expedited offers had a median sequence number at acceptance of 83.5, bypassing a median of 54.5 listed patients, and were more often placed at centers with higher offer acceptance ratios. Conclusion: Expedited placements are associated with lower-acuity recipients. Further policy reform should aim to ensure equity while optimizing organ placement and recipient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.