Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41695147›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

Gaps in large language model awareness, usage, and perceptions in the United States: Evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey.

Marco Angrisani, Maria Casanova, Nathanael J Fast, Jimmy Narang, Juliana Schroeder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco AngrisaniCenter for Economic and Social Research and Economics Department, University of Southern California, 635 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-6388
Maria CasanovaCollege of Business and Economics, Department of Economics, California State University, Fullerton, 2550 Nutwood Ave, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2615-9957
Nathanael J FastMarshall School of Business, University of Southern California, 701 Exposition Blvd - Hoffman Hall 431, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2183-9281
Jimmy NarangMarshall School of Business, University of Southern California, 701 Exposition Blvd - Hoffman Hall 431, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Juliana SchroederHaas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, 2220 Piedmont Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0538-0730

Funding

Enhancing engagement and participation of marginalized community residents in the UASU01AG077280 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Arie Kapteyn · 2023 to 2026
$50.9M
Toward Next Generation Data on Health and Life Changes at Older Ages: Administrative Supplement to track the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on American familiesU01AG054580 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KAPTEYN, ARIE · 2017 to 2022
$27.3M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG054580NIA NIH HHS U01 AG077280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to benefit users in both their work and personal lives, but which groups are quickest to adopt them? To investigate awareness, usage, and perceptions of LLMs among US adults across socio-demographic groups-and to track changes over time-we administered a two-wave survey using a nationally representative, probability-based online panel of 12,224 US residents. Across two survey waves spanning 1 year, we observed marked gaps in usage: groups more likely to use LLMs included men, younger adults, those with college education and higher incomes, individuals in more analytical occupations (e.g. STEM), Democratic-leaning respondents, and those with above-median cognitive ability, internet literacy, and openness to experience. These usage gaps do not appear to be declining and, in many cases, seem to be widening over time. Our analyses indicate that these disparities are associated with differences in both access-related factors (e.g. income, occupation, digital skills) and individual traits and preferences (e.g. openness to experience, political orientation). Overall, our data provide a dynamic picture of the rapidly evolving exposure to, adoption of, and attitudes toward LLMs in the US population.

Indexed as

digital dividesgenerative AIinequalityLLMstechnology adoption

Identifiers

PMID41695147
PMCPMC12897539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.