ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2026
Ocular siderosis caused by a subretinal iron foreign body masquerading as a blood clot: a case report.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We report a case of ocular siderosis caused by a subretinal iron foreign body. Observations: A 30-year-old male construction worker injured by a small piece of shrapnel while working visited an eye clinic for decreased vision in left eye on day X, and was subsequently referred to our hospital with a diagnosis of vitreous hemorrhage on day X+1. Although a penetrating foreign body was suspected, no obvious wound or intraocular foreign body was found even after the hemorrhage subsided. On X+3 months, a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was found and a lens-sparing vitrectomy was performed. A black elevated subretinal lesion was noted intraoperatively but not removed because it was considered to be a blood clot. The postoperative course was stable with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recovering to 20/16. However, the BCVA decreased to 20/30 on X+11 months with the subretinal lesion turning reddish brown. The electroretinogram also showed a significant attenuation of all stimuli. Siderosis was considered to have developed due to the subretinal foreign body. On X+14 months, we performed a combined phaco-vitrectomy to remove the foreign body. Analysis revealed iron as the main component of the foreign body. However, the postoperative electroretinogram remained unchanged, and the BCVA was 20/63 without improvement. Conclusions and importance: We experienced a case of a subretinal iron foreign body being mistaken for a blood clot. Even if the vision stays stable, ocular siderosis may occur over the long term if a subretinal iron foreign body remains. Therefore, surgical removal should be actively considered when a subretinal iron foreign body is suspected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.