Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41695024›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2026

Postoperative ERCP as proxy for clinically significant retained stones in a population-based cohort?

Eyvind Liljegren, Lina Hedestig, Emma Sverdén, Johanna Österberg, Lars Enochsson, Gabriel Sandblom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eyvind LiljegrenDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lina HedestigDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma SverdénDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johanna ÖsterbergDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars EnochssonDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Gabriel SandblomDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rate of retained common bile duct stones (CBDS) following cholecystectomy can only be estimated if CBDS managed conservatively as well as CBDS treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are identified. The aim was to explore the rate of retained CBDS and evaluate performance of ERCP as proxy for retained CBDS in a population-based setting. Methods: Data were collected from The Swedish Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Register (GallRiks) on patients who underwent cholecystectomy 2015-2020 with suspected CBDS at South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Medical records were reviewed to identify rate of patients with events raising suspicion of passage of retained CBDS and compare this to the rate of ERCP for retained CBDS. Results: A total of 182 of 386 patients (47.2%) had CBDS on intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). During follow-up, 33 of the 182 presented with retained CBDS according to medical records. Of these, 24 had an ERCP registered in GallRiks with retained CBDS reported, whereas 9 had retained CBDS according to medical records only. Conclusion: Postoperative ERCP found valid as proxy for retained stones following surgery for CBDS and can be a quality measure for management of patients undergoing gallstone surgery with suspicion of CBDS.

Indexed as

CBDSCholecystectomyCommon bile duct stonesRetained CBDS

Identifiers

PMID41695024
PMCPMC12905770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.