ReviewCureus2026
Hydroxychloroquine Use and the Risk of Breast Cancer in Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review With No Eligible Studies.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a cornerstone therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is frequently prescribed for long-term use, particularly in women. Although patients with SLE have been reported to have altered risks of malignancy, including breast cancer, the potential association between HCQ exposure and breast cancer incidence has not been clearly established. Given the widespread and prolonged use of HCQ, clarification of its long-term safety profile for cancer is clinically important. We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines to evaluate the association between HCQ use and breast cancer risk in women with SLE. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to December 29, 2025, without language restrictions. Eligible studies were required to include women with SLE, evaluate HCQ use as an independent exposure, report breast cancer incidence as an outcome, and provide extractable effect estimates. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. The search identified 548 records; after removing 73 duplicates, 475 were screened, and 469 were excluded. Six full-text articles were assessed in detail, but none met the predefined inclusion criteria, most commonly due to a lack of independent assessment of HCQ exposure or the absence of breast cancer-specific outcome analyses. Consequently, no studies were included in the final review. Despite extensive epidemiological research on cancer risk in SLE, no studies have directly evaluated the association between HCQ use and breast cancer risk in women with SLE. From an epidemiological standpoint, the absence of eligible studies is not unexpected, given the relatively low incidence of breast cancer in SLE populations and the widespread use of HCQ as standard-of-care therapy. A broader analytic strategy - such as evaluating overall malignancy risk associated with HCQ exposure with site-specific cancers examined as secondary outcomes - may represent a more efficient approach for future studies. Nevertheless, the lack of breast cancer-specific analyses treating HCQ as an independent exposure highlights an important gap in the literature, particularly given the frequency with which this question arises in clinical counseling of women with SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.